Unconfigured Ad

Collapse

Geaux Cajuns

Collapse

Ragin' Cajuns Roll
#RaCaRoll
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Suave
    replied
    Originally posted by JMV Just My View
    They have two players that I know of who could help this team right now. They have sent DM on X to all four coaches along with numerous emails, and phone calls and still just crickets from the staff. These are kids that are good players, grinders, great work ethic, and really not looking for NIL. If the staff isn't interested just email them back and say you don't have a spot but straight up ignoring someone who wants to be part of your program is crazy.
    I hope when this class is completed, some member of the media asks her to describe her recruiting philosophy . I’m not holding my breath though

    Leave a comment:


  • JMV Just My View
    replied
    They have two players that I know of who could help this team right now. They have sent DM on X to all four coaches along with numerous emails, and phone calls and still just crickets from the staff. These are kids that are good players, grinders, great work ethic, and really not looking for NIL. If the staff isn't interested just email them back and say you don't have a spot but straight up ignoring someone who wants to be part of your program is crazy.

    Leave a comment:


  • JMV Just My View
    replied
    Originally posted by Suave

    I’m ok with that. However , if a player is brought to her attention, she needs to review said player as you said. I hope she is doing that. But it sounds like she may not be.
    I never said she needs to review a player, I said she wants to review a player before signing them from what I have been told. I disagree with that. She doesn't specialize in hitting or pitching, so if Shipman is sent off to the west coast by himself and he sees a hitter he likes and feels like she can contribute to the Cajuns and then tells Alyson about that player, Alyson shouldn't have to go watch the player. That's wasting recruiting dollars and not trusting your coaches, who are actually doing the coaching.

    Leave a comment:


  • Suave
    replied
    Originally posted by JMV Just My View

    Are you talking about portal kids that have signed with other programs or high school kids who have signed with other programs? I've been told by a reliable source that Alyson will not sign anyone she hasn't personally reviewed.
    I’m ok with that. However , if a player is brought to her attention, she needs to review said player as you said. I hope she is doing that. But it sounds like she may not be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Headcase33
    replied
    Originally posted by Roarman

    So, what you're saying is because the P4 schools now have all of the elite pitchers, the chances of the Cajuns ever having an elite pitcher again are very slim. And, if they happen to recruit one or develop one, they won't be here for long because they will chase the money. Therefore, the only way the Cajuns can be successful is having a team full of run producers who can outscore their opponents.

    Well, unfortunately, the last two years, the Cajun teams were not built on run producers. Just look at number of home runs hit, doubles, runs scored, total bases, batting average and slugging percentage. And, maybe most importantly, sacrifice bunts.

    If you are correct and the Cajuns can't field a team with an era below 3 and can't field a team with run producers, results going forward will be the same results as the team experienced the last two years.
    That is correct, I dont see the cajuns back in the Top 25 if even Regionals they way its going.

    Leave a comment:


  • JMV Just My View
    replied
    Originally posted by Mark Hemphill
    This. I love Aly and she knows that. But her recruiting philosophy frustrates me. I don't understand why we aren't giving the D2's and JUCO's a hard look. We don't have the money to attract a nationally ranked recruit unless it's a hometown girl who might give a discount. So why not look at these levels of softball to find a diamond in the rough? To have only signed 2 players so far is such a frustrating thing to me. Especially when I see that other comparable programs have signed 5 and 6 players from the portal. I work with someone whose daughter played travel ball for the Hotshot organization. He said that a former UL player now coaches for them and has given the UL coaches a heads-up about several girls in that organization who were interested in UL. He said nothing but crickets from UL about these girls, some of whom have gone on to sign with other D1 programs. This is what frustrates me about this coaching staff. Why ignore a potential advantage like this?
    Are you talking about portal kids that have signed with other programs or high school kids who have signed with other programs? I've been told by a reliable source that Alyson will not sign anyone she hasn't personally reviewed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turbine
    replied
    Originally posted by JMV Just My View

    Mound=Baseball
    Pitching Circle=Softball
    Somebody got it backwards ... because ... everybody knows ... "Almond Joy got nuts ... Mounds don't."

    Leave a comment:


  • JMV Just My View
    replied
    Originally posted by Turbine

    That's a good point.

    I'm thinking about the ones who arrived at the P4 School while that school had an ace on the mound, so they sat their freshman and sophomore year.

    Now it's their junior year coming up and they're packing but have no stats to speak of mostly because they haven't had any playing time.

    Go after them

    I'm reminded of Jim Rome's old quote Rack'em when they have a great performance. Well the P4s is can stack'em but they can't rack'em (all.)

    So when those players that were in the stack, but didn't rack and decided to pack ... it's time to attract.
    Mound=Baseball
    Pitching Circle=Softball

    Leave a comment:


  • Turbine
    replied
    Originally posted by Vobserver

    The problem with your theory is that one can't "recruit" players still on another team's roster. Of course, we all know that the P4's skirt that rule all the time. The problem is that if someone outside the money club does so aggressively, they may be looking at USL 1973 redux.
    That's a good point.

    I'm thinking about the ones who arrived at the P4 School while that school had an ace on the mound, so they sat their freshman and sophomore year.

    Now it's their junior year coming up and they're packing but have no stats to speak of mostly because they haven't had any playing time.

    Go after them

    I'm reminded of Jim Rome's old quote Rack'em when they have a great performance. Well the P4s is can stack'em but they can't rack'em (all.)

    So when those players that were in the stack, but didn't rack and decided to pack ... it's time to attract.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vobserver
    replied
    Just as an aside: Of the top 10 ERA in D2 this past season, there are 7 with at least 2 years of remaining eligibility all of whom have ERA of 1.44 or better with 85 or more IP.

    Leave a comment:


  • cajunref
    replied
    Totally agree. This staff's recruiting approach is doomed for failure. Unless we have a boat load of cash, which we don't, you cannot target the players we are and ignore others as Mark has said. You can't recuit like you did at Bama, it will not work in today's landscape. If you can't or won't understand that, then maybe it's time for a change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vobserver
    replied
    Originally posted by Mark Hemphill
    This. I love Aly and she knows that. But her recruiting philosophy frustrates me. I don't understand why we aren't giving the D2's and JUCO's a hard look. We don't have the money to attract a nationally ranked recruit unless it's a hometown girl who might give a discount. So why not look at these levels of softball to find a diamond in the rough? To have only signed 2 players so far is such a frustrating thing to me. Especially when I see that other comparable programs have signed 5 and 6 players from the portal. I work with someone whose daughter played travel ball for the Hotshot organization. He said that a former UL player now coaches for them and has given the UL coaches a heads up about several girls in that organization who were interested in UL. He said nothing but crickets from UL about these girls of which some have gone on to sign with other D1 programs. This is what frustrates me about this coaching staff. Why ignore a potential advantage like this?
    What you said. 100%

    Leave a comment:


  • Vobserver
    replied
    Originally posted by Roarman

    So, what you're saying is because the P4 schools now have all of the elite pitchers, the chances of the Cajuns ever having an elite pitcher again are very slim. And, if they happen to recruit one or develop one, they won't be here for long because they will chase the money. Therefore, the only way the Cajuns can be successful is having a team full of run producers who can outscore their opponents.

    Well, unfortunately, the last two years, the Cajun teams were not built on run producers. Just look at number of home runs hit, doubles, runs scored, total bases, batting average and slugging percentage. And, maybe most importantly, sacrifice bunts.

    If you are correct and the Cajuns can't field a team with an era below 3 and can't field a team with run producers, results going forward will be the same results as the team experienced the last two years.
    Believe me, I look at all those things, and because our staff persists in trying to play small ball, our offensive production has been held down. Obviously we need more run producers, fewer slappers and a change in both recruiting philosophy and in game coaching philosophy to achieve success in this era.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roarman
    replied
    Originally posted by Vobserver

    I used those numbers because I believe that in the current climate 3.0 to 3.5 will become the new norm for programs outside the money club. Since 2024, the P4 have pretty much dominated the recruitment of elite pitchers, especially from the portal. Programs outside the money club will have to adjust their portal recruiting focus toward run producers, because acquiring experienced D1 pitchers with ERA under 3.0 in the portal is now virtually impossible without excessive amounts of money, as is keeping pitchers with low ERA.

    Playing time is important, but I don't believe that many girls will leave a program that is paying them 3 or 4 or 10 times the money that a program like ours can afford just to get more PT.
    So, what you're saying is because the P4 schools now have all of the elite pitchers, the chances of the Cajuns ever having an elite pitcher again are very slim. And, if they happen to recruit one or develop one, they won't be here for long because they will chase the money. Therefore, the only way the Cajuns can be successful is having a team full of run producers who can outscore their opponents.

    Well, unfortunately, the last two years, the Cajun teams were not built on run producers. Just look at number of home runs hit, doubles, runs scored, total bases, batting average and slugging percentage. And, maybe most importantly, sacrifice bunts.

    If you are correct and the Cajuns can't field a team with an era below 3 and can't field a team with run producers, results going forward will be the same results as the team experienced the last two years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark Hemphill
    replied
    Originally posted by JMV Just My View
    All I want is for them to be at least the best G5 school. Right not they are not even an top 25 G5 school.
    This. I love Aly and she knows that. But her recruiting philosophy frustrates me. I don't understand why we aren't giving the D2's and JUCO's a hard look. We don't have the money to attract a nationally ranked recruit unless it's a hometown girl who might give a discount. So why not look at these levels of softball to find a diamond in the rough? To have only signed 2 players so far is such a frustrating thing to me. Especially when I see that other comparable programs have signed 5 and 6 players from the portal. I work with someone whose daughter played travel ball for the Hotshot organization. He said that a former UL player now coaches for them and has given the UL coaches a heads up about several girls in that organization who were interested in UL. He said nothing but crickets from UL about these girls of which some have gone on to sign with other D1 programs. This is what frustrates me about this coaching staff. Why ignore a potential advantage like this?

    Leave a comment:

Working...