Not exactly how it works. While they are seeding 17 -> 32, 32 does not mean you are assigned to #1. They are trying to work the middle by providing competitive balance while also taking into account geography. Basically, a dual mandate that results in something that is not optimal. They group the #2 seeds into four pods of four teams ... and assign the pods based on competitive balance. So ... the last pod of #2 seeds would get assigned to the top four #1 seeds ... and so on ... hoping that conference alignment does not screw them ... and if it does, then they fudge the seeings. Yes, dual mandates do not work in all cases. But this is what they have chosen to do.
My thinking was that the Cajuns (with a win) would have been a #2 seed that was not in the last pod ... and therefore could have gotten assigned to a place like Texas ... or one of the lower Top 8 national seeds (because of geography). Short of that, I am fine with being a #3 seed.
And yes, #3 vs. #2 (by itself, does make a difference). You are facing a weaker team in the opening round and are the home team.
Brian
My thinking was that the Cajuns (with a win) would have been a #2 seed that was not in the last pod ... and therefore could have gotten assigned to a place like Texas ... or one of the lower Top 8 national seeds (because of geography). Short of that, I am fine with being a #3 seed.
And yes, #3 vs. #2 (by itself, does make a difference). You are facing a weaker team in the opening round and are the home team.
Brian
Comment